 |
Pick a
country. (AP Photo/Schalk van Zuydam)
|
Africa is not a country—but a continent with one
billion people, living in 55 different countries, and speaking more than 2,000
languages.
Yet a relatively narrow coverage of Africa and
its people exists not only in mainstream media, but as a new research paper
shows, in academia as well. Virginia Tech University analyzed 20 years of
research articles published in two major journals about African politics,
namely African Affairs published
by Oxford University and The Journal
of Modern African Studies by Cambridge University.
The paper investigated whether by reading
Anglophone scholarship on sub-Saharan politics between 1993 and 2013, one could
actually learn more about the region’s political reality and complexity.
In his paper, published this month, Ryan C.
Briggs, an assistant professor at the department of political science, notes
that studies around sub-Saharan Africa cluster heavily on a small number of wealthier, more populous, and
English-speaking nations.
Fewer than half of all the countries in the
region—46 in total—were written about more than 10 times, with the majority of them
being former British colonies like Nigeria, Ghana, and Kenya. Former French
colonies were the focus of about 5 papers on average, while those colonized by
Britain had about 27 articles written about them. Population size also mattered
a lot: for every 5% increase in a country’s populace, the number of articles in
every four-year period increased by about 3%.
If this shows us anything, Briggs writes, it is
that Anglophone research does not represent regional politics, but rather uses
“broad generalizations” deduced from specific countries to produce “a skewed
image of sub-Saharan Africa” that is then applied to other countries.
 |
| The cartogram on the right shows the same map after it has been distorted so that the area of a country is approximately proportionate to the number of articles written about it between 1993 and 2013. Light grey countries were British colonies and dark grey countries were French colonies. (Ryan C. Briggs) |
Briggs doesn’t absolve himself from this
practice: he told Quartz that his own work often focused on Ghana, Kenya, and
Malawi. He also said that he was prompted to undertake the project after seeing
how his students picked certain countries when they had to research about
African politics. Testing political theories broadly, Briggs argues, will go a
long way in solidifying research results and narrow the scope of
generalization.
“I also think this uneven coverage matters in
theory, because sometimes research ideas ‘travel’ and so something that is
tested well in one place may be applied to a different place and then fail,” he
said.
This bias in case selection is driven mostly by
researchers who are keen on getting easy access to a country, collecting
information fast, and publishing those results in good academic journals. And
speaking of Sub-Saharan Africa, the term itself is also problematic—given that it is as geographically confusing as it historically
loaded. Yet these biased, generalized claims are ultimately important because
they trickle down from academic halls into newsrooms, social media, and
ultimately into the hands of policymakers and thinkers.
One way to remedy this, however, is to engage researchers in institutions based on the African continent. In a 2016 paper, Briggs and Scott Weathers found that authors based out of the continent were more likely than those living in Africa to do specific country studies and use the results to generalize about conditions on the continent.
